Marysville Sound

Public Safety · Jun 17, 2026

Marysville Fire District board was scheduled to consider Station 61 remodel contract with TCA Architecture

Ahead of its June 17, 2026 meeting, the Marysville Fire District board was scheduled to consider directing staff to negotiate a Station 61 remodel contract with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. 1

What the records say

An agenda bill prepared for the June 17, 2026 Marysville Fire District board meeting said the complexity of remodeling projects at Station 61 required both architectural services and project management. The district combined the two into a single Request for Qualifications, published it under department policy, and received Statements of Qualifications from three candidates. 1 A selection committee interviewed, reviewed, and scored the candidates and proposed that the district negotiate a contract with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. The recommended action was a motion to direct District staff to negotiate a contract for professional services with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. for the purpose of remodeling Station 61. 1 The agenda bill lists budget code 594.22.624, states the amount is unknown, and lists no attachments. The available records do not establish the meeting's outcome. 1

  • The June 17, 2026 agenda bill concerned negotiation of a professional-services contract for the Station 61 remodel. 1
  • The district combined architectural services and project management into one Request for Qualifications and received Statements of Qualifications from three candidates. 1
  • A selection committee interviewed, reviewed, and scored the candidates and proposed negotiating with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. 1
  • The recommended action was a motion to direct District staff to negotiate a contract with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. for remodeling Station 61. 1
  • The agenda bill lists budget code 594.22.624, says the amount is unknown, and lists no attachments. 1

Why it matters

The record shows the board was scheduled to decide whether to begin contract negotiations for the architectural and project management work on the Station 61 remodel, but it contains no contract terms, cost, or construction timeline. Analysis: Because the agenda bill states the amount is unknown and includes no attachments, residents cannot learn the contract's price or detailed scope from this record alone; the eventual negotiated contract would be the next point of public visibility. 1

What changed / what's next

  • The agenda bill proposed moving from a completed selection process to negotiating a contract with TCA Architecture & Planning Inc. for the Station 61 remodel. 1
  • The board was scheduled to consider the motion on June 17, 2026; the supplied records do not establish the meeting's outcome. 1
  • The agenda bill lists no attachments and states the amount is unknown, so contract terms and cost were not in the supplied record. 1